🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation details a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to find the right solutions for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.